17.06.2025

Precision is critical in laboratories and testing facilities. When dealing with sensitive instruments, conducting high-risk studies, or calibrating equipment, professionals are aware that even minor amounts of unwanted noise may affect results, disrupt processes, and compromise data integrity. Despite this, many facilities fail to recognise the importance of soundproofing in lab environments.

Effective noise reduction is a key component of effective laboratory design. It ensures precision in measurement, protects delicate instruments from vibration interference, improves concentration, and facilitates clear communication among staff members. As testing and research environments get more complicated and equipment becomes more sensitive, the requirement for accurate acoustic control has only increased in recent years.

Soundproofing solutions must be customised, built to last long, and constructed based on a deep understanding of how noise travels and interacts with building structures.  This applies to various sectors, such as medical research labs, electronics facilities, as well as automotive and aerospace testing centres.

 

Why Soundproofing Is Critical in Laboratory and Testing Environments

 

Precision is required in all laboratories and testing facilities. However, precision is dependent on many factors, such as equipment calibration or clean room regulations, as well as acoustic control. Uncontrolled noise, even at low levels, can disrupt processes, harm readings, and create unnecessary danger in places where reliability is of high importance.

Impact on Instruments and Test Accuracy

  • Airborne or structure-borne vibrations can damage sensitive lab equipment, including oscilloscopes, microscopes, spectrometers, and calibration rigs. 
  • Low-frequency noise and vibration in electronics and engineering labs can distort signal readings and interfere with mechanical tolerances.
  • Microbalances and analytical tools in pharmaceutical or biochemical labs may detect interference from outside noise or vibrations, causing test results to differ by quantifiable margins.

Noise from the environment has immediate consequences in facilities where acoustic, vibration or environmental testing is taking place. If the testing setting is not properly isolated from external noise sources such as HVAC systems, mechanical equipment, or surrounding workplaces, measurements may be affected. 

This is critical for laboratories pursuing ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, which states that ambient circumstances such as noise and vibration do not affect the validity or replication of results. Failure to control these variables could undermine the credibility of the results and the lab's ability to meet international requirements.

 

Effect on Staff Performance

People are affected by noise. According to a study published in The Journal of Environmental Psychology, exposure to background noise decreases focus, increases cognitive load, and reduces accuracy in attention-demanding tasks. In labs, where extensive analysis and strict procedural control are required daily, this results in higher error rates, slower productivity, and more often mental exhaustion of employees.

Clear verbal communication is also highly necessary in shared lab environments, most importantly when conducting collaborative studies or safety-critical processes. Reverberation or background noise from equipment can make coordination difficult and increase the possibility of miscommunication, which is a significant danger in high-stakes situations.

 

How to Identify and Isolate Noise Sources

 

First off, effective and efficient lab soundproofing starts with a clear understanding of where the noise comes from and how it moves throughout a space. Without these inspection steps, even high-quality materials and careful construction may fall short. In most lab conditions, noise travels via two main pathways: airborne and structure-borne.

Airborne Noise vs. Structure-borne Noise

 

  • Airborne noise is a sound that travels through the air. It includes talking, ventilation hum, exterior traffic, or noise coming from equipment placed in nearby rooms. It can enter through walls, doors, windows, and HVAC ducts.
  • Structure-borne noise travels through solid materials, such as floors, ceilings, walls, and support frames. Vibrations from heavy machinery, pumps, or sometimes footsteps on overhead walkways can propagate through a building’s structure and radiate back as sound inside the lab.

Both types have their own set of issues, but they need different strategies in order to control them. Airborne noise is usually dealt with by mass and airtightness (soundproofing), while structure-borne noise requires isolation and separating techniques.

What are Common Noise Sources in Laboratories

  • HVAC systems - One of the most common and underestimated noise sources. Fans, ducts, and vents generate both low-frequency rumble and high-frequency whoosh, often with intermittent fluctuations that interfere with stable measurements.

  • Mechanical equipment - Centrifuges, pumps, compressors, or cooling systems generate both airborne and structural vibrations.

  • External disturbances - Urban traffic, neighbouring facilities, elevators, footfall, or even conversations outside a test room can leak in if walls or doors are under-treated.

Identifying whether the problem is airborne, structure-borne, or both is essential for choosing the right treatment method.

 

Measurement Tools and Diagnostics

Before applying any treatment, the lab environment should be analysed using professional diagnostics. Common tools include:

  • Sound level meters measure dB(A) values across a space to determine general loudness.

  • Vibration sensors detect mechanical resonance and structure-borne energy.

  • Real-time spectrum analysers provide visual feedback on changing acoustic signatures over time.

This data can reveal patterns and pinpoint where the enclosure, wall, or floor is underperforming. To support this phase, DECIBEL offers on-site noise measurements and acoustic simulations that provide detailed acoustic profiles to guide the design.

 

Materials and Construction for Effective Lab Soundproofing

 

To create a space that blocks external noise and manages internal acoustics, it's important to differentiate between soundproofing and sound absorption. Here's how each works and why both matter in a precision lab environment.

What is the Difference Between Soundproofing and Sound Absorption

Soundproofing and sound absorption are often confused, but they serve different purposes, and both are necessary in lab environments.

  • Soundproofing blocks sound from entering or leaving a space. It uses dense, sealed materials to prevent airborne noise from travelling through walls, floors, ceilings, and doors.

  • Sound absorption reduces echo and reverberation inside a room. Absorptive materials do not block sound but help control how it behaves once it's already inside a space.

Soundproofing in lab design is used to create physical isolation from the surrounding outside noise. This is essential for protecting sensitive instruments and maintaining test conditions for accurate results. On the other hand, sound absorption is used inside the room to create a controlled acoustic environment that supports focus, clear communication, and reliable auditory measurements.

A mistake that is often made is applying soft absorptive materials like foam or fabric panels in spaces where actual sound isolation is needed. These panels reduce echo, but they do little to stop external noise from entering. For labs that demand precision, both techniques must be applied strategically for great results.

Addressing Wall, Floor, and Ceiling Assemblies

In order to effectively soundproof a lab, construction assemblies must be designed to block, dampen, and isolate sound across all structural parts.

Walls should be built with high-mass materials such as concrete, gypsum board with mass-loaded vinyl layers, or double-stud assemblies with air gaps. These materials actively reduce airborne transmission and help control low-frequency vibrations.

Floors can benefit from floating floor systems that use rubber isolators or resilient mounts beneath concrete slabs. This decouples the floor from structural vibration and is especially important in electronics or microbalance lab environments. 

Ceilings often transmit both airborne and impact noise, so to treat this, suspended acoustic ceiling tiles can absorb reflections, and back-loaded ceiling assemblies can block transmission from overhead rooms or ducts.

In most cases, layered construction works most effectively. A dense outer shell blocks noise and a gap or air cavity reduces transmission. Absorptive materials on internal surfaces handle reflections. Where structure-borne vibration is a concern, additional isolation mounts or spring systems may be required.

These constructions should be planned early in the design process. Changing anything after construction is finished is possible, but often more complex and less effective.

Addressing Doors, Windows, and HVAC Penetrations

No matter how well a lab is built, sound can still leak through small gaps. Furthermore, the most common weak points are doors, windows, and ventilation systems.

Doors should be solid-core or purpose-built acoustic doors. All lab doors must include full perimeter seals and drop-down acoustic thresholds to prevent sound flanking around the edges. Since hollow-core or standard office doors would allow significant noise leakage inside the room.

Windows should be made from laminated or acoustic-rated glazing. Double glazing with an air gap works well when combined with sealed frames.

HVAC systems are major pathways for airborne noise. Every air duct entering a lab space should include acoustic silencers or internal lining in order to prevent noise transfer. Long, straight ducts should be avoided, as they allow sound to travel directly.

According to ASHRAE standards for lab design, mechanical noise from HVAC systems should be kept below NC-30 (Noise Criterion level) in precision testing spaces.

Customised Soundproofing Approaches for Lab Types

Not all laboratories face the same acoustic challenges. The specific soundproofing approach must match the function, equipment, and environmental requirements of the space. 

These are three common lab categories where specialised strategies are essential:

Scientific and Pharmaceutical Labs

In pharmaceutical, biomedical, and chemical labs, even soft vibrations can affect precision instruments like centrifuges, microbalances, or spectrometers. These labs often operate in sterile environments, where standard acoustic materials may not meet hygiene or chemical-resistance requirements.

The focus here is on vibration isolation. Equipment should be placed on anti-vibration tables or isolated platforms, especially when working at the micro- or nano-scale. Structural transmissions from adjacent machinery must be separated by floating floors or elastomeric mounts.

Walls and ceilings must be both sound-absorbent and cleanroom-compatible. Materials like chemically resistant acoustic panels, such as metal perforated PZP panels,  smooth-surfaced composites, and non-fibrous absorbers are used to control reflections without contaminating the environment.

According to guidelines from the U.S. Pharmacopeia and ISO 14644, laboratory environments must maintain strict control over both physical and acoustic interference to ensure data integrity in analytical testing.

 

Electronics and Engineering Test Environments

Labs working with sensors, circuits, and measurement devices are especially vulnerable to both acoustic and electromagnetic interference. Even low levels of ambient noise can affect test signals or create errors in calibration routines.

For these environments, anechoic or semi-anechoic chambers are often required. These rooms eliminate sound reflections and simulate free-field conditions. These are ideal for audio equipment testing or electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) assessments. Absorptive wedge panels, non-reflective flooring, and vibration isolation are used together to create controlled test zones.

In cases where both noise and electromagnetic interference must be treated, shielding becomes another requirement. Acoustic treatments must be paired with EMC shielding materials, such as RF-blocking wall panels and conductive enclosures. 

Automotive and Aerospace Testing Facilities

These facilities typically deal with large-scale machinery, impact simulations, or mechanical stress testing. The challenge is to manage massive energy outputs, both airborne and structure-borne.

Rooms must be engineered with heavy-duty sound barriers, capable of blocking sound at low frequencies where engine or turbine tests generate peak energy. This requires concrete enclosures, thick composite wall assemblies, and vibration-isolated foundations.

Inside, the reverberation should be controlled without compromising airflow or access of workers. Sound-absorbing baffles and suspended panels are installed at strategic points to reduce reflections without obstructing operations. Ceilings often require steel-suspended cloud panels, while walls may be fitted with high-impact acoustic tiles.

Structural separation is also crucial. Test beds and equipment mounts are often placed on floating slabs to prevent noise from transferring into nearby areas or through the foundation of the facility.

In aerospace labs, particularly where turbine or wind tunnel testing occurs, these principles are scaled up to meet the demands of sound levels exceeding 110 dB. A standard such as ISO 3744 is often referenced for measurement and sound isolation design.

 

Ensuring Compliance

 

To make sure that labs perform reliably and meet legal requirements, acoustic design must follow international and national standards. These include:

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 - Defines workplace noise exposure limits in the U.S., including allowed exposure levels and required protective measures.

UK Building Regulations, Approved Document E -  Addresses in detail sound insulation and noise control in buildings, applicable to labs integrated in commercial or mixed-use facilities.

Verification should be done through acoustic modelling during design, followed by in-situ testing after installation. The most important parameters include background noise levels, frequency response, and reverberation time. Proper documentation of these results supports lab accreditation, internal audits, and regulatory inspections.

 

 

Airborne or structure-borne noise can distort data, interfere with sensitive instrumentation, and impair the dependability of test results. It can also impair focus and communication, increasing the likelihood of human error. As previously mentioned, precision in laboratories is influenced by the quality of your equipment as well as the quality of the surroundings. 

Effective lab soundproofing needs a specialised strategy, which includes detecting noise sources, selecting the appropriate materials, building high-performance structures, and sealing leakage points. Acoustic control is crucial in labs that handle delicate measurements, such as electronics and drugs.

Contact DECIBEL to explore custom soundproofing solutions built for precision, adaptability, and compliance. 

 

We use cookies on our website. By continuing you accept these cookies. Find out more about cookies.